A continuing series of learnings from a variety of interesting & informative podcasts.
This Extract is from an Dan Carlin's Hardcore History Show 24(Classical Hanson) RSS http://feeds.feedburner.com/dancarlin/history?format=xml
- Who would Victor David Hansen pick in a Las Vegas style bet and what would be the spread between Julius Caesar vs. Alexander the Great?
- Alexander's landscape was far greater, much more vast in conquest. But he didn't create anything afterwards. It was divided up into Greek monarchies which later turn over to the Romans.
- Julius Caesar was very different. He had far fewer resources and large amount of civil unrest back in Rome. He was trying to create stable provinces and institutions that would integrate via a marriage with Rome. These provinces would later become places like Belgium, France & parts of Spain.
- The achievements as a general, Julius Caesar wasn't as spectacular as Alexander. But Caesar's achievements were more realistic, rational and they latest longer. Caesar had a better mind then Alexander. Alexander was more of a romantic, a person of the day, where as Caesar had a mind of a century.